ABSTRACT
This chapter discusses indigenous movements, to develop a more nuanced description and classification of such movements, to link variations among types of movements to hegemonic cycles. It rethinks the range of movement goals, strategies, and types so as to place indigenous movements within a larger context of movements that are either overtly antisystemic, antiglobalization, or that seek to reform either or both. Nearly all other antisystemic, antiglobalization, or antineoliberal movements directed against the continued growth of the neoliberal project primarily seek a better position within the contemporary system. The effects of hegemonic cycles in core areas are different from those in peripheral areas. They are mediated through cycles of nationalism and nationbuilding and also part of the larger tributary to capitalist shift. The chapter suggests that periods of hegemonic transition are particularly dangerous times for indigenous movements and peoples. Key factors are their levels of sovereignty, autonomy, or minority status.
