ABSTRACT

Originally published in 1971, this volume contains papers invited for a conference on economic research relevant to national urban development held in September of the same year. The conference pulled together researchers from both the United Kingdom and the United States who were interested in economic research on key issues of both countries’ management of their urban areas. Papers are varied from those in the early stages of research to those whose research has been completed and all provide an insight into the increase of urbanisation present in the first world. This title will be of interest to students of environmental studies and economics.

chapter 1|1 pages

Thompson Many are impatient today with questions such as: how big should cities be, what mixtures of work should they perform, and where should they be located? This emphasis sounds too dated and too closely related to the impersonal focus of the earlier city planner who was almost wholly a physical planner. It is people not places that demand our attention, the new breed of urbanists sternly insist. It is poverty, race, crime and the quality of the environment that are at issue. This charge can not be answered without first admitting that at many times and in many contexts --in policy contest with local merchants, landlords, land-owners and publix officials -- vested business, property or job interests of people and places are in sharp conflict. But in more extended discussion among persons with less vested interest in particular pieces (academics, with little at stake any place?), it should be possible to reaffirm quickly the primacy of people and then to move quickly on to a consideration of the size, function and location of cities as a means to good ends. We might choose to save some small place because we wish to save some elderly poor person an expensive and unnecessary move, or we may wish to conserve a stock of good, used housing during a housing shortage. Or we may elect to shut down a small place to break a cycle of poverty that threatens persons yet unborn. We may limit the size of a city or empty out a fragile natural area to avoid creating an ecological "hot spot" that would be very costly or impossible to reverse. We may see in •* national settlement 27 May 1971

chapter 10|1 pages

Thompson layers of an inferior one. Towns in this context remain "alive" by being transformed into low-skill, low-income, isolated ghettoes --under-development traps. Many "remote" small towns are nearly ripe enough to fall into the expanding commuting range of the nearest metropolitan area; they will be rescued by transportation improvements before they have time to de-populate to a point of no return. Such a town will tend to become a specialized part of a more complex system --typically a dormitory satellite. Euthanasia The appropriate public policy responses to recent develop-ments in remote small places is much too complex to be detailed in so short a paper and too much beyond the present state of knowl-edge to be discussed definitively in any length paper. Still, the three fates sketched above suggest the broad outlines of three quite different policies and strategies. No one should still be surprised by the pervasiveness of absolute decline in population; no statistic has been more quoted over the past few years than the fact that one-half of our counties lost population during the 1950-60 period. Nor will the almost inexorable power of this trend be obscured when the 1970 data have been assessed and popularized; two-fifths of our counties have lost population for three successive decades. Certainly, an official de-population policy and strategy would be political dynamite, but why is there virtually no literature on the graceful abandonment 27 May 1971

chapter 11|1 pages

Thompson of obsolete places, created by those who are not in a politically sensitive position. In general, the current position of students of regional development is that capital investments in semi-permanent infra-structure -- interpreted broadly to range from transportation and utility systems to technical institutes and housing -- are most appropriate for small cities that have been designated as "growth poles." Investments in health and education, especially in younger persons, increase occupational and geographical mobility and are therefore most appropriate for remote small places with bleak futures, as well as the more direct and obvious relocation allow-ances.^ As general policy, so far so good; but it is an operational strategy that is so needed and so unclear. A few illustrations will, however, suggest the kinds of ques-tions that we need to address seriously. At what point in the de-population of a settlement is it appropriate for the next larger unit of government to assume responsibility for the financing and/or the provision of a given public service? Just as the county sheriff was responsible for the safety of the rural population before in-corporation, so too the sheriff could resume that function with contraction. Should the state reserve the right — practice the policy -- of revoking local government charters at some given stage of contraction? Turning from institutional arrangements to human resources, the order-of-march in migration, by age and education and whatever, 27 May 1971

chapter 13|1 pages

Thompson of serving the nation as a half-way house between the fields and the factories. The paradox of migration is that everyone could become better-off -- the rural migrant moving in, the out-migrant to the city and even those who stay and rise in the local hier-archy, due in part to the out-migration of the strong -- the nation, as a simple collection of these parts, would be richer because the allocation of labor would be better, but the locality as a place could be worse-off. Those who rrove into a community do not have to be less educated or poorer than those they join to impoverish a community, merely of lower socio-economic status than those they replace -- the top of the stock that moved out. We do not have to put places ahead of people to recognize that places are environments for people, who may thrive or languish on the basis of rich or poor personal contacts and public sectors. We are probably fortunate, as a nation, that localities can not prevent the in-migrâtion that beggars them, but we err in not providing compensatory payments to these staging areas, not just for the sake of equity in income redistribution but even more to provide incentives to localities to undertake the critical func-tions of education and acculturation less reluctantly and more effectively. The nation should monitor the gross flows of migra-tion at the local level to know better which of its many agents in human resource development are most strategically located: typically and paradoxically,.those communities most impoverished in inter-regional trades in human capital. Can we express national development goals in these localities 27 May 1971

chapter 19|1 pages

Thompson supply of streets, sewers, schoolrooms and trained personnel. The case for the U shaped curve is almost always an easy

million population have the best of both worlds: scale enough to attain moderate economic stability but still small enough to avoid difficult-to-manage complexity. If so, smaller places would be better off being larger, and the sooner, the better. Smaller places would then attain their maximum welfare by growing a little

chapter 22|1 pages

Thompson Migration, City Size and the Market Can we trust the market and self-interest to adjust the size distribution o f cities through migration? On the whole, social scientists have preferred to work with the process of migration because it is a clear act, observable and measurable in a familiar behaviorial framework, rather than with the structure of city sizes, the culmination of a long and complex chain of historical, physical, technological and institutional forces. But migration is much more complicated than it appears on first impression, for there are many less-appreciated linkages between persons to add to the more-appreciated non-market forces. Small places do not empty out as promptly or as fully as they would under a pure market model of behavior for at least two reasons. First, each wave of out-migrants draws more than pro-portionately from the more educated, talented and ambitious elements of the local population, leaving behind an ever weaker labor pool from which to draw the teachers, counsellors and leaders of all kinds that must meet the challenge of re-working a harder and harder core of unemployables and immobiles. Reinforcing this adverse sequence is the conflict of interest between parent and child. Middle-aged parents with poor schooling and few, if any, job skills that will transfer to the newer, larger place are often better off staying on the farm or in the village through the remainder of their working lives, and on into retirement. But their children have no future in agriculture or in the small place and, in fact, 27 May 1971

chapter 28|1 pages

Thompson pollution and the re-cycling of matter. Physical planners have, of course, long been concerned with the loss of open space in and around cities. But too often they over-played the "calamitous loss of irreplaceable prime agricultural land" which in some not too clear way was held to threaten our very existence. Their anguish in a time of farm surpluses did not transfer well to their critics.9 Tax abatement for near-in farms never did elicit much support, nor would it have prevented many rural to urban land con-versions. Care would have to be taken that property tax reductions did not simply subsidize and encourage land speculation. The case for urban open space has always seemed to rest primarily on recre-ational use and secondarily on its use to delineate boundaries more sharply to strengthen community identity and build civic responsi-bility. An ironic turn of fate may bring forth a new variation on the old theme of agricultural land as urban open space. Experimental design is underway in at least one urban area (Muskegon, Michigan) for dumping liquid household effluent on porous soils (sand dunes) over a period long enough to enrich these soils to good agri-cultural quality. Waste disposal becomes the re-cycling of matter. Natural ecological imperatives could come to dictate popula-tion densities and urban land-use patterns. Given then the speed of transportation and the maximum acceptable commuting time (one hour?), the urban area may come to be defined "from the ground-up." The current direction of causation would then be reversed: city size would not determine population density and land-use patterns but rather land-use patterns and population density, as bounded by 27 May 1971

chapter 31|1 pages

Thompson redundant (cheap) female labor, but there are some very clear weaknesses in the connecting chains. The blending of the capital intensive ("heavy") industries, invariably unionized, with the ("footloose") industries would not

lighter work of the more mobile seem to happen naturally or automatically through the market forces. Typically, oligopoly product price power in combination with aggressive unionism raises heavy-industry wage rates/"roll-

chapter 32|1 pages

Thompson industries age and their technology matures, skill requirements fall and the industries become free to relocate in lower wage (lesser skill) areas. The higher a city stands on the industrial skill hierarchy, the younger its industries and the more likely it is to fashion an average rate of growth out of a fast-growing industry-mix and declining shares of that work -- the innovation of new work and the spinning-off of work that has become routine. The lower an urban area in the skill and wage hierarchy, the older an industry tends to be when it arrives in town and the slower its national growth rate. Intermediate level places tend to fashion a slightly above average rate of growth out of growing shares of slow-growing industries, but below this size the positive change in share weakens and erodes to zero, leading to slower than aver-age growth (net out-migration) below about 25,000 population and absolute employment decline below 2,500 population. This hypothesis has not been subjected to anything more than very preliminary testing (which did support it) and probably can not be rigorously tested without a more disaggregated data than the U. S. Census S.I.C. two-digit ("industry group) employment

figures that currently serve as the basic data of "shift-share analysis. But the credibility that even casual reflection and observation lend to this hypothesis does seem to suggest that it would not be premature to give some thought to the implications that a national industry filtering process carries for national

chapter 33|1 pages

Thompson discrete hierarchy of skill (education), wage level (income) and employment growth (vocational opportunity)? Can this dynamic variation on the more static theme of central place theory be accepted with mild interest as a theoretical or empirical curi-osity, as seems to be true of so much of regional economics, or are there important normative and policy ramifications here? If industries do in fact filter down through the national system of cities, then human resources would tend to filter up in a complementary way. The textile and apparel towns of the Piedmont area have been able to maintain full employment of a rapidly expanding labor force -- have been able to absorb the exodus from agriculture in that region --by capturing an ever larger share of these slow-growing industries. But tight local labor markets have not produced an average per capita income, as the more ambitious and talented young adults of that region have migrated out (filtered-up) to various larger places. Worse still, this trading of high talent for low skill work has compromised the long run development potential of that region. This is, moreover, a double-edged sword in that the larger, more industrially sophisticated urban areas of the North struggle with heavy unemployment that leads to near unemployability and, in large measure, for lack of low-wage unskilled work. New York City needs low skill work as desperately as a textile town needs skilled work. In general, if natural increase tends to produce a population with a random distribution of talent and ambition, and if industrial filtering tends to sector high and low skill 27 May 1971

chapter 34|1 pages

Thompson work into distant local labor markets, then massive migration is dictated. But if the more talented, motivated and educated are the more mobile, the net flow is biased toward the larger, higher skill places. Large Cities as Instruments of National Economic Policy The urban hierarchy and the industrial filtering process, as presently constituted, could perhaps be assimilated in a way which would serve the national interest if we were to act to increase the mobility of labor, especially the lesser skilled workers, and to arrange inter-regional fiscal transfer of a magnitude that would ensure that local public services were made reasonably uni-form from place to place, to assure equality of opportunity. Or we could instead see in the current trend toward large metropoli-tan areas the resolution of the problem of balancing local labor markets, and reinforce that trend. If nearly the whole national population were contained within a handful of very large metro-politan areas, each of which would perhaps be more a conjuncture of overlapping local labor markets than a single, indivisible commuting space, then virtually the full range of occupations would be within easy reach of nearly everyone. Every area would not, of course, produce every product; inter-regional product specialization and trade would continue. And gross flows of migration would go on, as between universities for example. But a nation of multi-million population metropolitan areas would produce balanced local labor markets as a by-product. 27 May 1971

chapter 35|1 pages

Thompson Such a distribution of national population would also greatly simplify national economic policy in many ways. Expansionary monetary and fiscal policy is complicated when significant infla-tion begins to appear in some places (with leading industrial sectors) before full employment is attained in other places (with lagging sectors). Similarly, repressive monetary and fiscal policy can create serious unemployment in, say, durable goods centers while strong inflationary pressures persist in service centers. Variation in local business cycles can not be fully explained by differing industry-mixes but the industrial diversi-fication that accompanies larger size would certainly make an important contribution to inter-regional symmetry in the response to national economic fluctuations and their treatment. (It is only fair to point out that the inner city ghettoes of our largest metropolitan areas would have to be intégrât much better into the regional econorrry of which they are only nominally a part now before we could make a fully convincing case for the employment stabilizing virtues of the very large loc I economy.) Again, the industrial diversification characteristic of large metropolitan areas tends to generate similar income patterns, and thereby reduces the need for heavy inter-regional fiscal transfers. Federal policy-makers are then freer to concentrate on programs or incentives that induce a more efficient land-use pattern or that create a more effective organization of local government, if they were less bound by equity considerations or income goals. It is much easier to deny an average, rather than a low, income area 27 May 1971

chapter 39|1 pages

Thompson as narrowly channelled movement speeds movement through more capital intensive transportation systems, this further increases occupational and consumer choice in space. Because mobility increases with income, in many ways, one gets the suggestion of a partial resolution to the problem posed in the opening pages. Strips of physically distinct middle-size cities, drawn together in time by very rapid (if sometimes expensive) transportation, might happily offer an escape from physical bigness to some and access to economic bigness to others. And with proper land-use control, open space for recreation can be preserved nearby, per-pendicular to the strip. By comparison, small, scattered towns gain closer open space but suffer thinner local labor markets, and large circular cities mass jobs and shops but lose access to the countryside. Strips of cities may not be all that bad. Low Density Urbanization A third spatial dimension of American urbanization and one that seems destined to become a major policy focus is the steady conversion of high-density agricultural land into low-density urbanized regions, ranging from the more heavily populated Piedmont Crescent of the Carolinas to the less populated delta of Eastern Arkansas. The Piedmont population, in aggregate, rivals that of the Atlanta city-region, but it is still an open question as to whether its loose-knit form can generate as much developmental power as is characteristic of that more classic urban form. The Piedmont has made a relatively successful transition from primary 27 May 1971

chapter 43|1 pages

Thompson Reprise: Migration in a' System of Cities A number of ideas that seem to dominate the discussion of population distribution policy can be brought together usefully in a simple schematic figure and summarized as follows: a) The de-population of rural areas should, at least on theoretical grounds, lead to higher returns per worker and higher levels of money income and well-being, as shown by point A. Logically, rural areas should be left with not only fewer farmers but also the best farmers, b) If rural out-migrants were to locate in middle-sized urban areas (D), they would tend to increase the money income (productivity) and probably further increase the real income of the inhabitants, as the growing local market permits greater range of choice in goods, services and occupations. If the place of out-migration is in the stage of diminishing returns and the place of in-migration is in the stage of increasing returns, and wages (income levels) are by implication higher in the latter place, everyone benefits: those who move, those left behind and those being joined. Migration here (from A to D) is clearly in the public interest. c) The most discussed case of the day is the migration from small towns (B) to very large cities (E). Such moves usually bene-fit the migrant who rises from welfare level 3 to E but could leave everyone else worse off. Those left behind in the small town, growing smaller, face higher costs of utilities and higher taxes for those hard-to-cohtract (indivisible, heavy-fixed-cost) opera-tions, and a reduced range of choice of goods, services and 27 May 1971

chapter |1 pages

1he Various Populations.

chapter |4 pages

3 -

chapter |2 pages

7 -

chapter |8 pages

9 -

chapter |17 pages

17 -

chapter |2 pages

34 -

chapter |8 pages

36-

chapter |1 pages

44 -

chapter |6 pages

45 -

chapter |6 pages

51 -Evans 14.