ABSTRACT
A common assumption in the literature on intimate relationships is that communication processes, as distinct from the issues or topics under discussion, are a leading cause of adverse relationship outcomes. This chapter presents the case study of Sylvia and Carl Svensson. It examines the common belief that poor communication prompts couples' relationship dissatisfaction and dissolution, discusses how communication might be better thought of as a symptom of other relational or contextual problems. Distressed couples appear to display a distinct style of communication marked by high levels of negativity, low levels of positive engagement, and difficulties extricating themselves from negative cycles of interaction. Emerging research suggests that the association between communication and relationship satisfaction is more complex than originally assumed. For example, while some studies find that couples benefit from avoiding negative communication, others find that in some cases couples benefit from engaging in such behaviors.
