ABSTRACT
The authors revised the answers to the discllssion questions to provide more robust, theory-related responses.
The case is dense with facts and gives solid detail to the events of the case. I suggest that it be reread with the objective of editing oul unnecessary detail in order to increase further its readability. The 1M 's structure should fo ll ow categories listed in the first 1M section, above. Place the detailed answers to the DQs with integrated theory and "A" and "C" answers in only o ne place in the 1M. Don't refer the reader to other places in the 1M for the answers. Exhibit E Q 4 Board Diagram is very complete. It should be located wi th the other DQs and their answers. Use the Board Diagram as an illu stration of how to teach the various DQs in class.
