ABSTRACT
This chapter discusses the pause and offers a consideration of the constraints of oedipal theorizing on sexuality and gender through the overview of literature. If sexuality and gender are interdependent then not only are they constrained by hetero-normativity, but a change in approach to sexuality might axiomatically require a change in gender approach. Homosexuality carries a burden on gender's behalf and the implications for a change in position may upset more than the sexual order. Anchoring homosexual development within a heterosexual norm gave the destabilizing potential of the Oedipus complex safe passage through the Darwinian imperative of survival. The chapter suggests that unwavering adherence to the oedipal model makes it difficult to think creatively about sex and gender. It discusses the case for disturbance, not through altruism or kindness or even equality but because hetero-normatively is a poor basis on which to build theory about gendered as well as sexualized identities and a inadequate tribute to Freud's work and spirit.
