ABSTRACT

Providing the first in-depth intellectual and organizational mapping of the single state idea’s recent resurgence in Palestine/Israel, this book enquires into its nature as a phenomenon of resistance, as well as into its potential as a counterhegemonic force in the making against the processes of Zionism.

Reconstructing this moment of re-emergence through primary material and interviews with diverse influential intellectuals—its analysis highlights their self-understandings, worldviews, strategies and perceptions of the phenomenon in which they are involved, while questioning whether the single state idea has the potential to become a Gramscian inspired movement of resistance against Zionism. In presenting this rare insight into a resistance movement in the making, this book resurrects an empowering image of Antonio Gramsci infused with the writings of Edward Said. This it does in an effort to both problematize the dominant interpretations of Gramsci’s writings in International Relations, and to decolonise the abstract way in which resistance and counter hegemony are often studied in the discipline.

Contributing a mapping of a silenced alternative and hopeful way forward in the context of escalating violence, this book is essential reading for those studying the Arab-Israeli conflict, Middle East Politics and International Relations.

chapter |14 pages

Introduction

chapter |4 pages

Interlude

The many images of Antonio Gramsci

chapter 1|30 pages

Edward Said and revitalizing Gramsci's project of counterhegemony

Laying theoretical foundations

chapter 2|24 pages

The context

The Oslo Accords and the hegemony of Zionist common sense

chapter 3|33 pages

The re-emergence of the single state solution

An intellectual mapping of an emergent movement

chapter 4|37 pages

The re-emergence of the single state solution

An organizational mapping of an emergent movement

chapter 5|28 pages

Building a war of position

The tactic of BDS, anti-Zionist Jewish voices, and the single state solution

chapter |9 pages

Conclusion

Reflections on Saidian-Gramscian counterhegemony