ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the limitations of architectural convention in relation to programme, in particular the directive that space be designed for timely purpose. In institutions such as cultural centres, which are intended for very specific, even political uses, programme is given an understandably central role. The chapter examines the concept of 'timeliness' and the investment of this value-laden idea in the assumption that space, once created, is purposeful and determined; while programme may be flexible, it will inevitably unfold over time. It also argues that the institutional failure to centralise Indigenous conceptions of space and time is a continued reason for the inability of designs to fulfil their political and administrative intentions of empowerment and recognition. The chapter discusses two contrasting examples of Indigenous political place-making, one institutionalised, the other informal and community-driven, to extrapolate the idea that the failure to adequately engage with work through Indigenous space-time practices results in the continued marginalisation of already seriously socially disadvantaged groups.
