ABSTRACT

There is still little agreement on the processes responsible for learning in man and animals. As these volumes show, work with people has tended to foster an active, information-processing view of learning, whereas research on instrumental and classical conditioning in animals is dominated by simpler theories. The usual view of classical conditioning is that it represents a cumulative process that moves progressively toward one or other asymptote of performance with each reinfarcement or nonreinforcement (see Rescorla, Chapter 1 of this volume). There is less consensus about the processes responsible far instrumental (operant) conditioning.