ABSTRACT
We report on an experiment that investigated how people naturally communicate with computational devices using speech and gaze. Our approach follows from the idea that human-human conversation involves the establishment of common ground, the use of gaze direction to indicate attention and turn-taking, and awareness of other’s knowledge and abilities. Our goal is to determine whether it is easier to communicate with several devices, each with its own specialized functions and abilities, or with a single system that can control several devices. If conversations with devices resemble conversations with people, we would expect interaction with several devices to require extra effort—both in building common ground and in specifying turn-taking. To test this, we observed participants in an office mock-up where information was accessed on displays through speech input only. Between groups, we manipulated what participants were told: in one case, that they were speaking to a single controlling system, and in the other, that they were speaking to a set of individually controlled devices. Based on language use and gaze patterns, our results suggest that the office environment was more efficient and easier to use when participants believed they were talking to a single system than when they believed they were talking to a several devices.
