ABSTRACT
We present experimental evidence from a study in which we monitor eye movements as people respond to pre-recorded instructions generated by a human speaker and by two text-to-speech synthesizers. We replicate findings demonstrating that people process spoken language incrementally, making partial commitments as the instruction unfolds. Specifically, they establish different referential domains on the fly depending on whether a definite or indefinite article is used. Importantly, incremental understanding is observed for both natural speech instructions and synthesized text-to-speech instructions. These results, including some suggestive differences in responses with the two text-to-speech systems, establish the potential for using eye-tracking as a new method for fine-grained evaluation of dialogue systems and for using dialogue systems as a theoretical and experimental tool for psycholinguistic experimentation.
