ABSTRACT
This chapter explores the verbatim–gist distinction, which is incorporated in fuzzy-trace theory, to the interpretation of metaphors. It addresses the question of whether interpretations of metaphors are represented as gist and whether verbatim and gist representations of metaphors display the same properties as analogous representations of other stimuli, such as numbers. The chapter discusses the theoretical implications of this analysis for such issues as the relation between literal and metaphorical interpretations; developmental differences in the interpretation of metaphors that describe psychological states; and the indeterminacy of metaphorical meaning. The ultimate metaphorical interpretation, is a product of the generic sense of "to alleviate pain" coupled with a plausible re-interpretation of that generic sense in light of the specific scenario. The chapter argues that interpreters process the gist of literal meaning in order to arrive at metaphorical interpretations.
