3 . . ETvh income aeesn se fodr im co en usnito an ri nessaarteadh is icguhss le evdeilnoMfdresvB el aosp te m r’ esnitnitn ro adnuycs ti eonns . e, the use of national tha 5 t . tIhneaennv in ir ionndm ic ean to ta rlicsobsetisnagrweiidgenloyrcehda . llenged, e.g. by Mishan [1967], on the grounds ( dtehvoeulg opment tpeo re t stin h it is misl een ad ti iagl paper Divatia and ng , ly badseesdcroin be fdun as daammeBnh ta alttf [ a1c9t6o9r ] ipnuptutfsorsw uc a easure of the ‘pace o h rd a different index of ments in such an index could foreshadow what the future pac fedeavselcoappm ita elnta ’) n . dMsokv il e ls ciinnocdureledxasbeet . w T ic heeaisnd fa esxtfaosr India, fo r example, is encouraging becau soefietcsohnoowmsicag ra ro te w o th f gro 6 w . tThhp is otuesnetio al f w th il elbnet at rhee io leraesaeldn nal in , alteito com a nal iel one nctohm at e d . eBvuetl , oopfmceonutrw se, it does not follow that fact the great spurt forward in nationa hlaidncboem en e s developed by il Clo ta l k in e C pl laacrek . [1937], In d al utee rn la artg iv e e ly wtaor ti t m he epuonle ic m ie psl . oyment problem, altho ta u ti gsh ti caslsiontthoet1h9e30nseeadndto19q4u0asnw tif ays suc 7 h . b In ia saedsda it rieonp , aritni direct taxes of various kinds on luxuries are relatively heavy, so ass 8 u . mFeor ( eesxpaem cia pllley , is cualajroluyrsneevyerteowwhoernkm re arket prices are used as weights. issues are now being a p jo o u se rn deiyno in nduastm ria eltrcoopao ll l y it aannuenndderpgrrooduuncdt, as national estimators a untries by the failure roafilnwaaty io ! n )? alA in dcdoim tio entaol in ll o9tw . hfaEtvosr th eerny se e . costs of environmental destruction, i.e. to be a sufficiently ‘net’ concept food consu msop ti oofn te , nwah ic rehseoafrccohuerrse tr ise im spto ly dmraew an csornecvleuasliionngsthaebo im utpltirceantd io snisnopfearsscuam pi p ta t E io v1ne0s ry and i . n ma cTlhdueerebiysaon ff iucp ia wlsatradti ded in the nationa b st iiacsiaanssw . ell. The share of output covered by official statistics, o co fvoeu re tp dubtypaosfsfe ic siatlhrso ta utg is h th l e in choam nd e s , toefndosrgtaonriizseed , pbaurstilnyeb ss e , cawuh se ic ahg is romwo in re g proportion data collection. tics, but also partly because of the general impr oavdeem qu en at t el iyn Di 1 st 1 r . Th 12. ibVua ti eUro io nuo .N sfI . nc S o ta m ti e s , tical Offic poverty li n Expenditu e r ’s e a ‘A nd CWoemap lt lhe ’ m is enataursye fu sy lsstteam rt in ogf -p Sotian ti t s . tics of the are 13d . isSceuesspeadpbey rs FboynA se bceale [ s19 in 70 I ] n , dia, where there has been much work on this question, -Smith, Bagley, Rei Yo1r4k . , T le haidsinpg ro hbilm em to wda is stifn ir gsut is re hcboegtnw iz eeedn by nRaonwdnT tr oewen [1 se 9 n 01 d ] in in Thoiwsncs la esnsd ic [ 1e9n7q0u ], iry in r in ef e fa rr citnagtttaoin th iet. poverty of those who coul ‘ dpraifm fo arrdy ’ thaendnu ‘s t e ri cto io nndaalrym ’ ipno im ve urm ty — bu th tedo la n tt oetr [ b1y9175a0 . ], Sdw ee, ist h in ic ho ghuiswheo ve she wdrt , haatnev in e te group onf rest u ec si o n in nggomthpieas ir otssam to eftc art hre it e ic Prli es by Minhas [1970] and Bardhan cslouusricoenss can be reached on trends in the propo lraonnno in fgpoM ve is r s ty io ( n o ) nveeprryopdo if sfe er den in t1c9o6n2 c th hraonuggehsaunsd in dgifd fe if rfeenrten in t te sources of consumption dta io ta n , sdliyfifneg re nbtelaolw lo w th aencp es ovfeorrtypr li incee val 1e6n . ceSeovfep ra olve in r d ty iciantoarsnacrapnolbae ti ocnom pr boicneeddutro es . give us an indicative profile of the pre m pr eondtuhhcaeasdsba een experimenti t n io gnw , s it uhch in aGse th n e ev U a. . N In . fRaecstetahrecyhhIanvse ti ttu ak te e n fo arsStoecpiaflurD th eevrelaonpd wISneesvtsiehtruoatluel ’ dsnin te vnetsa ti t g iv a e ti o ‘d nesvo el fom pm ul etn ip tliend as ic saotcoira ’ t , ioa weighted average of various series. The against it) oofttfraelaltiinntgotthhiestirnadpic (a a s to wreacso ‘ unlodr , a ns are inter ma lt t h iv oeu ’ g . hItthse im Ien st sitn it gutaen ’s d worth while, but which a country has advanced along a path indicated by data plfy ro mmecao su D re ir sec th to erewxa te r n ns t u to s sta 1 te 7 s . oSfeepIr . oLg . r O es . s [ ; 1 9 se 7e0U untries at different de ], TNhReIpSoD in t [ 1 is 96m9a ], de there that the measurement of unemployment as paen ca dussveeroyfm pe urcshonoanltfh ru esd tr im at e io n n sion of the problem that concerns one—unemployment exp 1r8e . ss T ly hel im Pa it reedtotocm oe e ff aiscu ie ri nnt, godn , low income or loss of output. istr th ib euto io th nearmhoanngd , hiw gh h e ic rhinlcoonmgesh . ad its advocates, is
DOI link for 3 . . ETvh income aeesn se fodr im co en usnito an ri nessaarteadh is icguhss le evdeilnoMfdresvB el aosp te m r’ esnitnitn ro adnuycs ti eonns . e, the use of national tha 5 t . tIhneaennv in ir ionndm ic ean to ta rlicsobsetisnagrweiidgenloyrcehda . llenged, e.g. by Mishan [1967], on the grounds ( dtehvoeulg opment tpeo re t stin h it is misl een ad ti iagl paper Divatia and ng , ly badseesdcroin be fdun as daammeBnh ta alttf [ a1c9t6o9r ] ipnuptutfsorsw uc a easure of the ‘pace o h rd a different index of ments in such an index could foreshadow what the future pac fedeavselcoappm ita elnta ’) n . dMsokv il e ls ciinnocdureledxasbeet . w T ic heeaisnd fa esxtfaosr India, fo r example, is encouraging becau soefietcsohnoowmsicag ra ro te w o th f gro 6 w . tThhp is otuesnetio al f w th il elbnet at rhee io leraesaeldn nal in , alteito com a nal iel one nctohm at e d . eBvuetl , oopfmceonutrw se, it does not follow that fact the great spurt forward in nationa hlaidncboem en e s developed by il Clo ta l k in e C pl laacrek . [1937], In d al utee rn la artg iv e e ly wtaor ti t m he epuonle ic m ie psl . oyment problem, altho ta u ti gsh ti caslsiontthoet1h9e30nseeadndto19q4u0asnw tif ays suc 7 h . b In ia saedsda it rieonp , aritni direct taxes of various kinds on luxuries are relatively heavy, so ass 8 u . mFeor ( eesxpaem cia pllley , is cualajroluyrsneevyerteowwhoernkm re arket prices are used as weights. issues are now being a p jo o u se rn deiyno in nduastm ria eltrcoopao ll l y it aannuenndderpgrrooduuncdt, as national estimators a untries by the failure roafilnwaaty io ! n )? alA in dcdoim tio entaol in ll o9tw . hfaEtvosr th eerny se e . costs of environmental destruction, i.e. to be a sufficiently ‘net’ concept food consu msop ti oofn te , nwah ic rehseoafrccohuerrse tr ise im spto ly dmraew an csornecvleuasliionngsthaebo im utpltirceantd io snisnopfearsscuam pi p ta t E io v1ne0s ry and i . n ma cTlhdueerebiysaon ff iucp ia wlsatradti ded in the nationa b st iiacsiaanssw . ell. The share of output covered by official statistics, o co fvoeu re tp dubtypaosfsfe ic siatlhrso ta utg is h th l e in choam nd e s , toefndosrgtaonriizseed , pbaurstilnyeb ss e , cawuh se ic ahg is romwo in re g proportion data collection. tics, but also partly because of the general impr oavdeem qu en at t el iyn Di 1 st 1 r . Th 12. ibVua ti eUro io nuo .N sfI . nc S o ta m ti e s , tical Offic poverty li n Expenditu e r ’s e a ‘A nd CWoemap lt lhe ’ m is enataursye fu sy lsstteam rt in ogf -p Sotian ti t s . tics of the are 13d . isSceuesspeadpbey rs FboynA se bceale [ s19 in 70 I ] n , dia, where there has been much work on this question, -Smith, Bagley, Rei Yo1r4k . , T le haidsinpg ro hbilm em to wda is stifn ir gsut is re hcboegtnw iz eeedn by nRaonwdnT tr oewen [1 se 9 n 01 d ] in in Thoiwsncs la esnsd ic [ 1e9n7q0u ], iry in r in ef e fa rr citnagtttaoin th iet. poverty of those who coul ‘ dpraifm fo arrdy ’ thaendnu ‘s t e ri cto io nndaalrym ’ ipno im ve urm ty — bu th tedo la n tt oetr [ b1y9175a0 . ], Sdw ee, ist h in ic ho ghuiswheo ve she wdrt , haatnev in e te group onf rest u ec si o n in nggomthpieas ir otssam to eftc art hre it e ic Prli es by Minhas [1970] and Bardhan cslouusricoenss can be reached on trends in the propo lraonnno in fgpoM ve is r s ty io ( n o ) nveeprryopdo if sfe er den in t1c9o6n2 c th hraonuggehsaunsd in dgifd fe if rfeenrten in t te sources of consumption dta io ta n , sdliyfifneg re nbtelaolw lo w th aencp es ovfeorrtypr li incee val 1e6n . ceSeovfep ra olve in r d ty iciantoarsnacrapnolbae ti ocnom pr boicneeddutro es . give us an indicative profile of the pre m pr eondtuhhcaeasdsba een experimenti t n io gnw , s it uhch in aGse th n e ev U a. . N In . fRaecstetahrecyhhIanvse ti ttu ak te e n fo arsStoecpiaflurD th eevrelaonpd wISneesvtsiehtruoatluel ’ dsnin te vnetsa ti t g iv a e ti o ‘d nesvo el fom pm ul etn ip tliend as ic saotcoira ’ t , ioa weighted average of various series. The against it) oofttfraelaltiinntgotthhiestirnadpic (a a s to wreacso ‘ unlodr , a ns are inter ma lt t h iv oeu ’ g . hItthse im Ien st sitn it gutaen ’s d worth while, but which a country has advanced along a path indicated by data plfy ro mmecao su D re ir sec th to erewxa te r n ns t u to s sta 1 te 7 s . oSfeepIr . oLg . r O es . s [ ; 1 9 se 7e0U untries at different de ], TNhReIpSoD in t [ 1 is 96m9a ], de there that the measurement of unemployment as paen ca dussveeroyfm pe urcshonoanltfh ru esd tr im at e io n n sion of the problem that concerns one—unemployment exp 1r8e . ss T ly hel im Pa it reedtotocm oe e ff aiscu ie ri nnt, godn , low income or loss of output. istr th ib euto io th nearmhoanngd , hiw gh h e ic rhinlcoonmgesh . ad its advocates, is
3 . . ETvh income aeesn se fodr im co en usnito an ri nessaarteadh is icguhss le evdeilnoMfdresvB el aosp te m r’ esnitnitn ro adnuycs ti eonns . e, the use of national tha 5 t . tIhneaennv in ir ionndm ic ean to ta rlicsobsetisnagrweiidgenloyrcehda . llenged, e.g. by Mishan [1967], on the grounds ( dtehvoeulg opment tpeo re t stin h it is misl een ad ti iagl paper Divatia and ng , ly badseesdcroin be fdun as daammeBnh ta alttf [ a1c9t6o9r ] ipnuptutfsorsw uc a easure of the ‘pace o h rd a different index of ments in such an index could foreshadow what the future pac fedeavselcoappm ita elnta ’) n . dMsokv il e ls ciinnocdureledxasbeet . w T ic heeaisnd fa esxtfaosr India, fo r example, is encouraging becau soefietcsohnoowmsicag ra ro te w o th f gro 6 w . tThhp is otuesnetio al f w th il elbnet at rhee io leraesaeldn nal in , alteito com a nal iel one nctohm at e d . eBvuetl , oopfmceonutrw se, it does not follow that fact the great spurt forward in nationa hlaidncboem en e s developed by il Clo ta l k in e C pl laacrek . [1937], In d al utee rn la artg iv e e ly wtaor ti t m he epuonle ic m ie psl . oyment problem, altho ta u ti gsh ti caslsiontthoet1h9e30nseeadndto19q4u0asnw tif ays suc 7 h . b In ia saedsda it rieonp , aritni direct taxes of various kinds on luxuries are relatively heavy, so ass 8 u . mFeor ( eesxpaem cia pllley , is cualajroluyrsneevyerteowwhoernkm re arket prices are used as weights. issues are now being a p jo o u se rn deiyno in nduastm ria eltrcoopao ll l y it aannuenndderpgrrooduuncdt, as national estimators a untries by the failure roafilnwaaty io ! n )? alA in dcdoim tio entaol in ll o9tw . hfaEtvosr th eerny se e . costs of environmental destruction, i.e. to be a sufficiently ‘net’ concept food consu msop ti oofn te , nwah ic rehseoafrccohuerrse tr ise im spto ly dmraew an csornecvleuasliionngsthaebo im utpltirceantd io snisnopfearsscuam pi p ta t E io v1ne0s ry and i . n ma cTlhdueerebiysaon ff iucp ia wlsatradti ded in the nationa b st iiacsiaanssw . ell. The share of output covered by official statistics, o co fvoeu re tp dubtypaosfsfe ic siatlhrso ta utg is h th l e in choam nd e s , toefndosrgtaonriizseed , pbaurstilnyeb ss e , cawuh se ic ahg is romwo in re g proportion data collection. tics, but also partly because of the general impr oavdeem qu en at t el iyn Di 1 st 1 r . Th 12. ibVua ti eUro io nuo .N sfI . nc S o ta m ti e s , tical Offic poverty li n Expenditu e r ’s e a ‘A nd CWoemap lt lhe ’ m is enataursye fu sy lsstteam rt in ogf -p Sotian ti t s . tics of the are 13d . isSceuesspeadpbey rs FboynA se bceale [ s19 in 70 I ] n , dia, where there has been much work on this question, -Smith, Bagley, Rei Yo1r4k . , T le haidsinpg ro hbilm em to wda is stifn ir gsut is re hcboegtnw iz eeedn by nRaonwdnT tr oewen [1 se 9 n 01 d ] in in Thoiwsncs la esnsd ic [ 1e9n7q0u ], iry in r in ef e fa rr citnagtttaoin th iet. poverty of those who coul ‘ dpraifm fo arrdy ’ thaendnu ‘s t e ri cto io nndaalrym ’ ipno im ve urm ty — bu th tedo la n tt oetr [ b1y9175a0 . ], Sdw ee, ist h in ic ho ghuiswheo ve she wdrt , haatnev in e te group onf rest u ec si o n in nggomthpieas ir otssam to eftc art hre it e ic Prli es by Minhas [1970] and Bardhan cslouusricoenss can be reached on trends in the propo lraonnno in fgpoM ve is r s ty io ( n o ) nveeprryopdo if sfe er den in t1c9o6n2 c th hraonuggehsaunsd in dgifd fe if rfeenrten in t te sources of consumption dta io ta n , sdliyfifneg re nbtelaolw lo w th aencp es ovfeorrtypr li incee val 1e6n . ceSeovfep ra olve in r d ty iciantoarsnacrapnolbae ti ocnom pr boicneeddutro es . give us an indicative profile of the pre m pr eondtuhhcaeasdsba een experimenti t n io gnw , s it uhch in aGse th n e ev U a. . N In . fRaecstetahrecyhhIanvse ti ttu ak te e n fo arsStoecpiaflurD th eevrelaonpd wISneesvtsiehtruoatluel ’ dsnin te vnetsa ti t g iv a e ti o ‘d nesvo el fom pm ul etn ip tliend as ic saotcoira ’ t , ioa weighted average of various series. The against it) oofttfraelaltiinntgotthhiestirnadpic (a a s to wreacso ‘ unlodr , a ns are inter ma lt t h iv oeu ’ g . hItthse im Ien st sitn it gutaen ’s d worth while, but which a country has advanced along a path indicated by data plfy ro mmecao su D re ir sec th to erewxa te r n ns t u to s sta 1 te 7 s . oSfeepIr . oLg . r O es . s [ ; 1 9 se 7e0U untries at different de ], TNhReIpSoD in t [ 1 is 96m9a ], de there that the measurement of unemployment as paen ca dussveeroyfm pe urcshonoanltfh ru esd tr im at e io n n sion of the problem that concerns one—unemployment exp 1r8e . ss T ly hel im Pa it reedtotocm oe e ff aiscu ie ri nnt, godn , low income or loss of output. istr th ib euto io th nearmhoanngd , hiw gh h e ic rhinlcoonmgesh . ad its advocates, is