ABSTRACT

After the W ar of the North not all Frederick W illiam ’s troops were disbanded, since he was determined to keep at least some as a stand­ ing army. The war had shown how soldiers could be used to impose taxes whether the Estates agreed or not. Consequently, when the Brandenburg Estates’ permanent committee and successive repres­ entative diets refused to continue the contributions in the early 1660s and pressed instead for the remaining troops to be dismissed, Frederick W illiam showed his tougher and increasingly arbitrary side. In January 1662 he insisted to the Estates that 'the preserva­ tion of his lands depended next to God on arms’,1 and he followed his wartime practice of simply informing them what money he re­ quired and then seeing this was collected, sometimes by force. His promise of 1653 to consult the Estates was forgotten, as he became more convinced that he could only keep a permanent force by free­ ing himself from their financial shackles. Frederick W illiam ’s impa­ tience comes out clearly in tart comments written on a document presented by the Estates’ deputies in Ju ly 1666:

A few days later he told the deputies bluntly: ‘The burden of tax­ ation in the present circumstances is unavoidable . . . for our safety and welfare.’2