ABSTRACT

The conduct of colonial and foreign policy was necessarily influenced by the nature and limitations of British armed power. Until the last quarter of the nineteenth century the United Kingdom was spending more on its armed forces than any other state: 1

1870 (£)

1880 (£)

1890 (£)

1900 (£)

United Kingdom:

army

13,400,000

15,000,000

17,600,000

21,400,000

navy

9,800,000

10,200,000

13,800,000

29,200,000

Germany:

army

9,600,000

18,200,000

24,200,000

33,600,000

navy

1,200,000

2,400,000

4,600,000

7,400,000

France:

army

15,000,000

22,800,000

28,400,000

27,800,000

navy

7,000,000

8,600,000

8,800,000

14,600,000

Russia:

army

18,600,000

26,000,000

24,600,000

32,100,000

navy

2,400,000

3,800,000

4,400,000

8,400,000

The protection of Britain's world-wide imperial interests required a regular army which - though small by the standards of the Continent, where conscription prevailed - was bound to be comparatively expensive to maintain. After the ending of the Crimean War (1856) the size of the regular army was allowed to fall steadily under pressure for retrenchment; from an establishment over 200,000 in 1855 down to a low of 115,000 in 1870. Thereafter the total gradually rose again to reach over 150,000 during the 1890s.