ABSTRACT
It is a fact that by the time the Seagram building was designed in New York there were more and more buildings proportionately appearing with better designed corners. Despite that sign of good behavior in the manners of ‘terminating’ a building, there are several voices that protest in anger against the random slogans endangering the sovereignty of ‘eternally’ true rules. They claim that those theories about ‘mobility and growth,’ ‘openness and change’ that create this uneasiness of change can be proven wrong after going again through the definitions of time and space by Kant or Schopenhauer.
