ABSTRACT
Among the useful theories to explain the phenomenon of social aesthetics are functionalism, constructionism, social exchange, critical perspectives, and symbolic interactionism. The issue of difference is socially problematic, as evidenced by an intense public investment in setting and maintaining social boundaries. Returning to the constructionist approach, one may propose that social movements and social action re-do the meaning of difference. Structuralism considers choices and actions of individuals, rational and functional. Central to much of social ranking that takes place on a face-to-face basis is physical attractiveness. People judge others, and are judged by them, on appearance. Understandings and experiences of beauty can be described by basic interactionist concepts, notably identity, interaction, impression management, frame, and social networks. Interactionism is a micro-sociology, emphasizing interpersonal relations. Though micro in focus, interactionism is relevant on a large scale.
