ABSTRACT

During the 1980s and until 2007-with a short break for overcoming the dotFRPFULVLV²WKHOHJLWLPDF\RIWKHJOREDO¿QDQFLDOV\VWHPZDVQRWTXHVWLRQHGEXW celebrated. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher had saved an overburdened welfare state from collapsing, capitalism and the markets had brought down socialism, and by 2006 Allan Greenspan was not only a hero, but considered RQH RI WKHPRVW SRZHUIXOPHQ RQ HDUWK*OREDO ¿QDQFHZDV OHJLWLPL]HG E\ LWV huge success in terms of sustaining economic growth, providing easy credit, and LQFUHDVLQJWKHSURGXFWLYLW\RI¿QDQFLDOUHVRXUFHVWRDQXQKHDUGRIGHJUHH

Of course, there had been small crises and warnings of hidden risks, but nobody wanted to listen as long as the music played and the book-value of American real estate was rising (Roubini and Mihm 2011). The intricacies and black holes of QHZ¿QDQFLDOLQVWUXPHQWVDQGVWUXFWXUHG¿QDQFLDOSURGXFWVZLWKKLJKGHJUHHVRI leverage and derivatization remained opaque, even to specialists, and a pervasive ³LUUDWLRQDOH[XEHUDQFH´*UHHQVSDQUHLJQHGWKH¿QDQFLDOPDUNHWV 'RPDUNHWVLQJHQHUDODQG¿QDQFLDOPDUNHWVLQSDUWLFXODUQHHGOHJLWLPDF\"

Legitimacy is a concept which relates to public authority. Max Weber’s ideal type of rational-legal legitimacy still is helpful to describe a modern type of legitimacy as opposed to traditional or charismatic forms of legitimacy. However, the concept of formal democratic legitimacy must be subdivided into phases according to the democratic process of arriving at decisions. Input-legitimacy indicates the preconditions for formal democracy, that is, the principles of fair democratic elections like one person, one vote; party competition; regular periodic elections; real opportunities for participation in voting; and interest articulation. As Fritz Scharpf (1999) has argued, democracy would be an empty ritual if it did not produce effective and problem-solving outcomes. Therefore, output-legitimacy should be seen as an increasingly important correlate of formal legitimacy. Finally, the forms and procedures by which input is transformed into outputs constitute a third aspect of legitimacy, throughput-legitimacy, which has been expounded, for example, by Niklas Luhmann under the heading of “legitimacy of procedures” (Luhmann 1969) or by Herbert Simon as “procedural rationality” (Simon 1978).