ABSTRACT

This collection of essays by an international group of authors explores the ways in which law and legal institutions are used in countries coming to terms with traumatic pasts and, in some cases, traumatic presents. In putting to question what is often taken for granted in uncritical calls for reconciliation, it critically analyses and frequently challenges the political and legal assumptions underlying discourses of reconciliation. Drawing on a broad spectrum of disciplinary and interdisciplinary insights the authors examine how competing conceptions of law, time, and politics are deployed in social transformations and how pressing demands for reconstruction, reconciliation, and justice inform and respond to legal categories and their use of time. The book is genuinely interdisciplinary, drawing on work in politics, philosophy, theology, sociology and law. It will appeal to a wide audience of researchers and academics working in these areas.

chapter 2|16 pages

Reconciliation and Reconstitution

chapter 3|20 pages

The Risk of Reconciliation

chapter 4|24 pages

Reconciliation as Domination

chapter 5|18 pages

Brenna Bhandar

chapter 6|18 pages

Reconciliation: Where is the Law?

chapter 7|18 pages

Transnational Law and Societal Memory

chapter 8|16 pages

Adam Czarnota

chapter 10|30 pages

Feminism and the Ethics of Reconciliation

chapter 11|14 pages

Constitution as Archive

chapter 12|12 pages

The Time of Address