ABSTRACT

Taking its bearings from classic texts including Plato, Kant, Hegel and Arendt this thoughtful and intriguing book provides philosophical reflection on what it is to judge and what judgement achieves alongside, and sometimes in competition with, thinking and willing. Opening with the landmark Mabo High Court case in Australia and with detailed reference to other significant debates of judgement of the twentieth century Max Deutscher seeks to explore and explain approaches to the concepts of what is good, right and legal. Describing a connection between reason and grounds intrinsic to judgement he analyses and explores the tendency towards absolutism that displaces proper judgement. By weaving concrete instances of judgement with philosophical thought Deutscher provides a fascinating phenomenology of practices of judgement that should appeal to all readers with an interest in legal, philosophical and political thought.

chapter |10 pages

Introduction

part |51 pages

Achieving Judgement

chapter |22 pages

In Sensible Judgement

chapter |14 pages

Deemed and Sentenced

chapter |14 pages

Dissenting Judgement

part |45 pages

Making Judgements

chapter |16 pages

Judging as Right

chapter |16 pages

Living on the Premises1

chapter |12 pages

Inferring, Judging, Arguing

part |59 pages

Questioning Critique

chapter |22 pages

Sting of Reason

chapter |16 pages

Mystique of Critique

chapter |20 pages

Enigma Absolute

part |43 pages

Moving Establishment

chapter |16 pages

Nomadic Judgement

chapter |14 pages

Chasing After Modernity

Some Friendly Words for the Postmodern

chapter |12 pages

When to Forget