ABSTRACT

The shifting landscape of higher education is not without significance for the

positioning and role of academics within society. To meet the funding crisis, academics

are encouraged and incentivized to emerge, in some cases kicking and screaming, from

the closet, or ivory towers, of the university to engage with the wider world. Critics of

the changing character of the academic’s work and contribution – sometimes associated

with so-called Mode 2 knowledge production (Gibbons et al., 1994) – have cautioned

that closer collaboration with the private sector indirectly fetters and compromises the

distinctiveness and contribution of their role as economically independent producers

of knowledge (Grey, 2001). There is a related fear that academics will hesitate to

pursue their research or speak out (e.g. on social and environmental issues) whenever

the exercise of ‘academic freedom’ could discredit their standing as experts and/or

damage their chances of receiving Mode 2-type research programmes, especially

when these provide an increasingly vital source of revenues.