ABSTRACT

The authors have grouped the theories into three classical "families" which differ in their views relative to the prime motives underlying human nature. They show how theories are specific examples of more general points of view called paradigms. The theories chosen to represent the three paradigms (the Endogenous Paradigm, Exogenous Paradigm, and the Constructivist Paradigm) were selected because they met four criteria:

  • importance, as judged by academic and research psychologists
  • fertility, as judged by the amount of research the theory has generated
  • scope, as judged by the variety of phenomena the various theories explain
  • family resemblance, as judged by how well each theory represents its paradigm

The authors present the "paradigm case" in the lead chapter for each paradigm.  This paradigm case is the "best example" for the paradigm. The authors explain why paradigm cases are important, and give them more detailed treatment than other theories in the same paradigm.

part 1|37 pages

Preliminary Considerations

chapter 1|22 pages

Theories as Windows for Looking to See

chapter 2|13 pages

Evaluating Developmental Theories

part 2|136 pages

The Endogenous Paradigm

chapter 3|43 pages

Freud and Psychoanalysis

chapter 4|30 pages

Erikson and Psychosocial Theory

chapter 5|35 pages

Wilson and Sociobiology

chapter 6|24 pages

Ainsworth and Infant Attachment

part 3|114 pages

The Exogenous Paradigm

chapter 7|43 pages

Operant Conditioning

chapter 8|36 pages

Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory

chapter 9|32 pages

Vygotsky and Cultural-Historical Theory

part 4|100 pages

The Constructivist Perspective

chapter 10|42 pages

Piaget's Cognitive-Developmental Theory

chapter 11|35 pages

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

chapter 12|20 pages

The Neo-Piagetians

part 5|14 pages

Summing Up

chapter 13|12 pages

Are Theories Compatible?