ABSTRACT

Luisa Passerini writes about the paradox of memory (and, we can add, forgetting) that we cannot look for something we lost unless we remember it at least in part (Passerini 2003: 239). When investigating cultural memory of colonialism in Europe, a first impression many people have is one of silence in the sense of oblivion (Ricoeur 1994): colonialism, in this con - ception, has vanished without a trace. In the Netherlands, people have claimed that Dutch colonialism in Indonesia is not taught in high schools, not talked about in the media, that photographs of colonial atrocities committed by the Dutch colonial army have been swept under the carpet and that the voices of those once colonised by the Dutch are never heard in the Netherlands. Yet if we investigate particular places and communities, a different picture emerges: histories of Dutch colonialism have been part of the school exams since the 1970s, colonial ‘scandals’ (e.g. abusive labour conditions of coolies in colonial Indonesia) have been reported upon in newspapers since the nineteenth century, photographs of colonial atrocities were widely published and distributed in the early twentieth century, and the Netherlands has a rich tradition of publishing Indonesian authors, both originally writing in Dutch and in translation (Bijl 2012; Bijl 2015). How can we account for this impression of silence and this abundance of sounds? In this essay, analysing current cultural memories of the Javanese author Kartini (1879-1904) in Dutch contexts, I will argue that in investigating silences we need to pay particular attention to location as both sounds and silences are always unevenly distributed: while in certain locations there can be almost a cacophony of sounds, in others utter silence can be encoun - tered. Second, I want to show how silences, once they have occurred or been produced, change position and meaning over time, sometimes being perpetuated and repeated, sometimes changing character as they move across contexts. By investigating these two aspects I want to draw attention to silence’s spatial (synchronic) and temporal (diachronic) dimensions.