ABSTRACT
This book has set out to account for some of the key alterations occurring to summary justice within the lower criminal courts of the English justice system as they undergo various modernising transformations. These are in efforts to operate criminal courts that are responsive to the changing demands of the twenty-firstcentury,aswellasachievinganefficientlyrunandtightlymanaged criminalcourtservice.Inaddition,akeyfocuswithinthisexaminationhasbeen ontheexperiencesoflaymagistratesintheirjudicialcourtworkingroleandat this time of reform. This concluding section brings together the main themes framing the research material presented in the preceding chapters and the main arguments drawn out from the analysis. As such, it revisits aspects of the court process in which fundamentalalterationsarebeingmade thatcanbearguedareaccruingexamplesofmanagerialand technocratic justice.Lay justiceand theexperiencesof magistrates in their lower court judicial decision-making role are returned to, with links made to the value of citizen participation in this work. This is at the same time that it is argued that we are seeing the increasing professionalisation oflowercourtjustice,whichgoessomewaytowardsmagistratesbeingappraised aslaylegalprofessionals.Thischapteralsobrieflyrevisitstheconceptualtheory developed in Chapter 6 on the way that the lower criminal courts can be argued asembeddingsocialjusticeprinciples.Thisisspecificallyintheexampleofthe rehabilitative sentencing styles assigned to some offenders with health treatment and other lifestyle needs, and the specialist problem-solving court approaches that are growing in popularity with various offender groups across jurisdictions and in the UK. It is argued that enhanced notions of fair justice are a key feature of these approaches.