ABSTRACT

The previous chapter examined how water is given meaning through local PHPRULHV DQG QDUUDWLYHV DERXW ZDWHU ÀRZV DQG XVHV RYHU WLPH0HPRU\ KRZHYHU LV DOVRSUHVHUYHG DQG µUHVWV RQ«DQFKRUDJH LQ VSDFH¶ :DFKWHO SDQGWKURXJKWKLVSURFHVVPDWHULDOVLWHVEHFRPHsites of memory 1RUD7KLVFKDSWHUH[DPLQHVKRZWKHLQWHUWZLQLQJRIPDWHULDOLW\DQG memory in rural landscapes shape contemporary social imaginaries of place WKDWZRUNWRFRQ¿JXUHDQGUHFRQVWLWXWHVRFLDOSUDFWLFHVRIH[FOXVLRQ7KHVLWH of our analysis or ‘the anchorage in space’ we focus on is the building which KRXVHV WKH 5HQPDUN ,UULJDWLRQ 7UXVW 5,7 ZKHUH GHFLVLRQV DERXW ZDWHU allocations and use are made, where water infrastructure planning occurs and where, in contemporary times, it has become a localised point of advocacy for ORFDOLUULJDWRUVLQUHODWLRQWRWKHVWDWHVHH&KDSWHUVDQG7KLVPDWHULDO VLWHLVDVLWHRIVLJQL¿FDQFHIRULWVVRFLRSROLWLFDOLPSRUWDQFHLQ5HQPDUNDQG HTXDOO\IRULWVPDWHULDOSUHVHQFHLQVDQGVWRQHPRUWDUDQGFRUUXJDWHGLURQ± UHÀHFWLQJDPDWHULDOVLWHRIPHPRU\$FFRUGLQJWR7LOOH\S

Artefacts permit people to know who they are by virtue of the fact that WKH\DVVXPHVSHFL¿FIRUPVDQGLPDJHVLQWKHPLQGVRI WKHYLHZHULQD manner not possible to convey in words.