ABSTRACT
Synthesis intrasocial groups reflect both the resolution of conflict and the amplification of acceptance. The distinction between waking, dreaming, and mystical experience on the one hand and intrasocial experience on the other, is grounded in the objectivity of statements of preference by interviewed characters, and that is fundamental to the Dream Sociometric methodology. Individual characters can produce preferring/bipolar and preferring/rejected choice patterns in the Dream Sociomatrix. While waking attitudinal and emotional rigidity evokes dream and waking experiences that we consider to be antithetical, such growing inflexibility is also built into the nature of evolution and is therefore unavoidable. In the thesis stage, figure takes ground, whether social, dream or intrasocial, for granted, functioning in ways that are based on the substrate of unconsciously competent experience in each of the quadrants. Characteristics of thesis characters include capability, stability, meaningfulness, usefulness and relative trustworthiness.
