ABSTRACT
Waiter Lippmann had laid aside the book in 1942 partly because of the pressures of the war, and partly because he had trouble formulating the argument. For a time Lippmann was strongly drawn to Catholic theology, finding in its hierarchy and sense of order an antidote to a secularism that, in the guise of Nazism and communism, seemed impervious to moral restraints. Lippmann's argument was, as always, elegantly phrased, but even the finely wrought ardor of his prose could not conceal a disturbing vagueness. Lippmann's plea for a stronger executive liberated from the quibbling of paralyzed legislatures could hardly have fallen on more receptive ears. Lippmann was easy, considerate, and tolerant with his friends. He would respond interestedly to anyone who knew what he was talking about. Lippmann's social life was no less regular than his work habits. Among his friends Lippmann could be charming, relaxed and an eager listener. Strangers were usually impressed by his lack of pretentiousness.
