ABSTRACT
Katz, 2003a, 2003b; Katz and Aakhus, 2002; Katz and Sugiyama, 2005, 2006; Ling, 2003, 2004, 2008; Ling and Yttri, 2002; Sugiyama, 2006). As Fortunati (2001) states, the mobile phone’s identity is ambivalent and constantly on the move. The more people incorporate a mobile technology into their everyday life even to the point that many of them perceive it as a part of the body (e.g., Fortunati, 2003a, 2003b, 2005b; Fortunati et al., 2003; Katz, 2003a; Oksman and Rautiainen, 2003a, 2003b; Sugiyama, 2006), the more significance mobile technology starts to carry in everyday life.
