ABSTRACT

Thousands of years ago, Hippocrates supported in his teachings that every healer

who offers services to the sick experiences “a harvest of sorrows” that results from

being exposed to “the misfortunes of others” (Jones, 1923). This harvest of

sorrows continues to be largely ignored. There is a widespread belief that suffering

is experienced only by patients and families who are affected by the threat or

reality of death. Professionals are expected to be strong, stoic, and immune to the

suffering of others. This stoic approach was and continues to be espoused by the

medical model of care which promotes a disease-centered approach that focuses

on bodies and disease treatments rather than on people. With the advent of the

biopsychosocial model of care, focus shifted from suffering bodies to suffering

patients whose biopsychosocial and spiritual needs are being addressed. Thanks

to the palliative care movement, this patient-centered approach has been enlarged

to also include family members who are supported throughout the dying process

and death of their loved one. Despite this holistic, family-centered approach

to care, research evidence suggests that several families express dissatisfaction

with end-of-life care. Their dissatisfaction is mostly associated with unsatisfac-

tory relationships with care providers rather than to the medical and nursing

aspects of care. They expect more understanding, more availability, more genuine

concern, and compassion. In other words, they seek a different kind of relation-

ship that professionals do not always provide.