ABSTRACT
How can we make sense of sentencing? This question has long puzzled not only scholars but also policy-makers. For, if sentencing practice is to be described (let alone 'improved'), we necessarily have to interpret and explain it.
How can we make sense of sentencing? This question has long puzzled not only scholars but also policy-makers. For, if sentencing practice is to be described (let alone 'improved'), we necessarily have to interpret and explain it.