Introduction

Nevertheless, there are practical reasons for continuing to make use of “globalization” and “antiglobalization” as shorthand references to the complex dynamics of world developments. For one thing, these terms dominate the theoretical discourse in the field. For another, both terms do make reference to, and allow for a description of, several important dimensions of analysis both in regard to structural change and the forces of resistance against this change-against the forces that drive the system forward. In these terms, globalization has the appearance of a process that is irresistible, inevitable and inescapable-all countries and people having to adjust to it the best way they can, to insert themselves into the process under the most favorable conditions or to make the best deal possible.