ABSTRACT
The three case studies analyzed here suggest that state law has limits and dynamic Muslim legal pluralism is a perpetual, and most probably ubiquitous, fact. In other words, our three cases are different rnanifestations of the same reality.
The three case studies analyzed here suggest that state law has limits and dynamic Muslim legal pluralism is a perpetual, and most probably ubiquitous, fact. In other words, our three cases are different rnanifestations of the same reality.