ABSTRACT

Eros Under Suspicion The ‘death of God’ as we have decoded it signifies the repudiating loss of the ‘ontic logos’ (Charles Taylor’s term),1 which gave the pre-twentieth-century psyche its confidently assumed hold upon the world. Eros ceases to be able to count on its pre­ known or intuited correspondence with the being of things. The nineteenth century had believed ‘transcendentally’ in Eros - and suffered in consequence transcending traumas of disenchantment. Twentieth-century rebeginnings start at the other end - - ‘from below’, often in a spirit of vengeful demystification. Deprived of an objective correlate in the non-self, and finding no sanction in any purposive ordering of things, the promise of metaphysical transcendence previously intuited through love, and posited as a basis for love, slips away. The arrow of infinite longing then turns back upon itself in reactive - and often hyperbolic - self-suspicion.