ABSTRACT

I. THE PuRPoSES OF ADR: EmCIENCY, QUALITY, OR jUSTICE VALUES • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 1871

II. WHO SHOULD THE ACTORS BE IN ADR? • . • . . . • . . . • • . . . . . . . • • . . . 1876 III. WHAT PROCESSES CoNSTITUTE ADR? . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 1885 IV. To WHAT USES SHOULD ADR BE PuT? • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 1897 V. ETHICS AND STANDARDS IN THE USB OF ADR:

FOR WHAT PuRPoSES? . • . • • . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . • 1922 VII. RESoLVING THE DISPUTES AMONG DISPUTE PROFESSIONALS:

OF POUCY CHOICES AND PROCESS . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . • • 1930

~ the processes comprising alternative, or as we now say, "appropriate" dispute resolution mature and enter new phases of use, new issues have emerged to demonstrate that professionals engaged in providing dis· pute resolution services have disputes and conflicts among themselves. This Article reviews some of those conflicts and issues and suggests some resolutions for these disputes between dispute resolvers.