ABSTRACT

In his comprehensive study of love in James Joyce's writings, Christopher DeVault suggests that a love ethic persists throughout Joyce's works. DeVault uses Martin Buber's distinction between the true love for others and the narcissistic desire for oneself to frame his discussion, showing that Joyce frequently ties his characters' personal and political pursuits to their ability to affirm both their loved ones and their fellow Dubliners. In his short stories and novels, DeVault argues, Joyce shows how personal love makes possible a broader social compassion that creates a more progressive body politic. While his early protagonists' narcissism limits them to detached engagements with Dublin that impede effective political action, Joyce demonstrates the viability of his love ethic through both the Blooms’ empathy in Ulysses and the polylogic dreamtext of Finnegan's Wake. In its revelation of Joyce's amorous alternative to the social and political paralysis he famously attributed to twentieth-century Dublin, Joyce's Love Stories allows for a better appreciation of the ethical and political significance underpinning the author's assessments of Ireland.

chapter |16 pages

Introduction

chapter 1|22 pages

Love and Socialism in “A Painful Case”

chapter 3|20 pages

Stephen Dedalus's Marketplace of Love

chapter 4|14 pages

The Artist’s Amatory Aesthetics

chapter 5|24 pages

Abjection and Amor Matris in Ulysses

chapter 6|18 pages

Richard Rowan's Deep Wound of Doubt

chapter 7|22 pages

The Blooms’ Amatory Metempsychosis

chapter 8|14 pages

Molly’s Return to Howth

chapter 9|18 pages

The Politics of the New Bloomusalem

chapter 10|22 pages

Amatory Darwinism in Finnegans Wake

chapter 11|22 pages

Arrah Na Plurabelle

chapter 12|14 pages

Joyce’s Amorous Collideorscape