ABSTRACT

Computed tomography (CT) is not the imaging modality of choice for assessment of cardiac masses, which are typically initially imaged with echocardiography, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET)/single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). 401,402 However, CT provides valuable anatomic information in selected patients. It is for example superior in defining the relationship of lung masses to the pericardium and heart, 403 and may allow definition of the blood supply of cardiac masses. If dedicated CT imaging is planned, the protocol should be modified for the specific clinical question. 404 In other situations, CT may occasionally identify incidental cardiac masses. The anatomic criteria seldom allow a definitive histologic diagnosis, but rather differentiate between likely benign versus malignant lesions, with implications for further management.