ABSTRACT

There is clearly a need for microelectrodes on the same size scale as cells in both

stimulation and recording applications. When stimulating neural tissue, the

higher localization of current afforded by small electrodes may lead to higher

stimulation efficiency [1, 2]. Smaller and more densely spaced microelectrodes

can record neural activity from smaller volumes of neurons. However, following

implantation a cellular encapsulating sheath consisting of glial cells envelops

the microelectrode array [3]. The glial cells involved in the tissue reaction are

on the same length scale as the microelectrodes themselves. The tissue reaction

will increase the electrode-tissue interface impedance and will therefore alter

the path of current flow, thus decreasing the specificity with which the device

can stimulate or record from small volumes of neurons [4].