ABSTRACT
A
po de
m us
s yi
va tic
us L
.
76 .8
± 3
.8 0
Environment and Crop Production
Testing Pests, creatures, fungi Preparation Protective effect form vis-a-vis control, %
Stem and Lepidosaphes ulmi L. Solution 62.5 ± 2.20 branches Piesiocoris rugicollis Fall. 51.1 ± 2.45 of fruit trees Lygus pabulinus L. 47.3 ± 2.30
Psylla mali Schmiedl 67.0 ± 3.70 Aphis pomi de Geer 56.4 ± 2.50 Corpocapsa pomonella L. 38.0 ± 2.00 Tmetocera ocellana F. 43.4 ±2 .10 Hyponomeuta malineiius Zell. 67.5 ± 2.40 Panonychus ulmi C.L. Koch. 75.8 ± 5.50 Lepidosaphes ulmi L. Paste 75.8 ± 5.50 Piesiocoris rugicollis Fall. 68.3 ± 2.85 Lygus pabulinus L. 64.2 ± 3.30 Psylla mali Schmiedl. 78.0 ± 3.45 Aphis pomi de Geer. 77.5 ± 4.00 Corpocapsa pomonella L. 57.0 ± 2.80 Tmetocera ocellana F. 61.2 ± 3.10 Hyponomeuta malineiius Zell. 67.5 ± 2.40 Panonychus ulmi C.L. Koch. 63.0 ± 2.75
Splits and cuts Fungi Sphaeropsis malorum Paste 82.8 ± 3.80 on stems of Fungi Cryptosporiopsis curvispora ” 55.7 ±3 .10 fruit trees Fungi Cryptosporiopsis corticola ” 66.7 ± 3.20
