ABSTRACT

’No one of Shakespeare’s plays is harder to characterize’, said Coleridge of Troilus and Cressida. Over the centuries, generations of critics have faced the challenge of determining exactly what sort of play Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida is. Described by Victorian commentators as ’dark’, ’decadent’ and ’bitter’, the work has, until now, retained its designation as a ’problem play’. In this ground-breaking study, leading Shakespeare scholar, W R Elton attempts to dismantle this presumption. His research places the play in the historical context of the Inns of Court law-revels tradition. By close analysis of the text, Elton demonstrates his belief that Troilus and Cressida was written specifically for an audience of law students and lawyers and that the play manifests many elements of a law-revel, including misrule, inversion, mock rhetoric and logic, and mock trials. In so doing, he provides explanations for many of the puzzling and mysterious elements that have previously baffled critics.

chapter |18 pages

Introduction

part |2 pages

Part I Folly

chapter 1|25 pages

Burlesque, mock-epic and folly

chapter 2|19 pages

Misrule, mundus inversus and degree

part |2 pages

Part II Academic

chapter 3|9 pages

Academic

chapter 4|13 pages

Rhetoric

chapter 5|28 pages

Logic

chapter 6|16 pages

Value

part |2 pages

Part III Law revels

chapter 7|14 pages

Revels

chapter 8|18 pages

Law

chapter |4 pages

Conclusion

chapter I|2 pages

Troilus and law-revels' language

chapter II|10 pages

Troilus and legal terms

chapter III|7 pages

Troilus and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics