ABSTRACT
The formulation of the role of the religious shrine in the ancient period, as discussed in this study, is different from that which is generally accepted by historians of ancient India. In current historical writing, the emphasis has been on the spread of Sanskritic culture around the fourth–fifth centuries ce through movements of brahmanas at the behest of the emerging political elite and the consolidation of a feudal order. The temple is often associated with the newly emerging states in what is termed the early medieval period. In lieu of generous donations, the brahmanas and temples are said to have provided legitimisation to the rulers. 1 There is unanimity also in the association with migrations of brahmanas and their role as priests in consolidating the new cults, frequently described as of Puranic affiliation. How valid are these claims? These formulations have been countered elsewhere and the arguments will not be repeated here. 2
