Breadcrumbs Section. Click here to navigate to respective pages.
Book

Book
Debating Archaeology
DOI link for Debating Archaeology
Debating Archaeology book
Debating Archaeology
DOI link for Debating Archaeology
Debating Archaeology book
Get Citation
ABSTRACT
In this volume, the founder of processual archaeology, Lewis R. Binford collects and comments on the twenty-eight substantive papers published in the 1980's, the third in his set of collected papers (also Working at Archaeology and An Archaeological Perspective). This ongoing collection of self-edited papers, together with the extensive and very candid interstitial commentaries, provides an invaluable record of the development of "The New Archaeology" and a challenging view into the mind of the man who is certainly the most creative archaeological theorist of our time. A new (2009) foreword allows further reflections on his work.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
part I|2 pages
Introduction
chapter 1|9 pages
"Culture" and Social Roles in Archaeology
chapter 2|13 pages
The New Archaeology, Then and Now
part II|2 pages
Much Ado About Nothing
chapter 3|14 pages
Science to Seance, or Processual to "Post-Processual" Archaeology (1988)
chapter 4|14 pages
In Pursuit of the Future (1986)
chapter 5|14 pages
Data, Relativism, and Archaeological Science (1987)
part III|2 pages
Empiricism and Other Problems in Contemporary Archaeology
chapter 7|5 pages
Coping with Debate Tactics
chapter 9|13 pages
Brand X versus the Recommended Product (1985)
chapter 11|15 pages
Richard Gould Revisited, or Bringing Back the "Bacon"
chapter 12|26 pages
An Alyawara Day: The Stone Quarry (with James F. O'Connell) (1984)
chapter 13|25 pages
An Alyawara Day: Flour, Spinifex Gum, and Shifting Perspectives (1984)
chapter 14|18 pages
An Alyawara Day: Making Men's Knives and Beyond (1986)
chapter 15|19 pages
Butchering, Sharing, and the Archaeological Record (1984)
chapter 16|14 pages
Styles of Style (1989)
chapter 17|42 pages
Researching Ambiguity: Frames of Reference and Site Structure (1987)
part IV|2 pages
Models and Accommodating Arguments versus Pattern Recognition: What Drives Research Best?