ABSTRACT

Have globalization, virulent ethnic differences, and globally operating insurgents fundamentally changed the nature of war in the last decade?

Interpretations of war as driven by politics and state rationale, formulated most importantly by the 19th century practitioner Carl von Clausewitz, have received strong criticism. Political explanations have been said to fall short in explaining conflicts in the Balkans, Africa, Asia and the attacks of 11 September 2001 in the United States.

This book re-evaluates these criticisms not only by scrutinising Clausewitz's arguments and their applicability, but also by a careful reading of the criticism itself. In doing so, it presents empirical evidence on the basis of several case studies, addressing various aspects of modern war, such as the actors, conduct and purposes of war.

chapter |27 pages

Introduction

Debating the Nature of Modern War

chapter |37 pages

Strategy in an Age of ‘Low-Intensity' Warfare

Why Clausewitz is Still More Relevant than his Critics

chapter |21 pages

Warfare in Civil Wars

chapter |26 pages

A Different Kind of War?

September 11 and the United States' Afghan War *

chapter |24 pages

New Wars, Old Warfare?

Comparing US Tactics in Vietnam and Afghanistan

chapter |18 pages

The Wars in Former Yugoslavia in the 1990s

Bringing the State Back in

chapter |15 pages

Elaborating the ‘New War' Thesis

chapter |17 pages

Rethinking the Nature of War

Some Conclusions