ABSTRACT

I am by trade a social anthropologist, not a psychologist. Let me begin, therefore, with the question that, perhaps more than any other, motivates anthropological enquiry. Take two people from different backgrounds and place them in the same situation; they are likely to differ in what they make of it. Indeed such difference is something that every anthropologist experiences in the initial phases of fieldwork. But why should this be so? How do we account for it? In their attempts to answer these questions, anthropologists have come up against some of the most contested issues in the psychology of perception and cognition. My task in this chapter is to show how they have dealt with these issues. The chapter is divided into two parts. In the first part I trace something of the history of the problem over the past century of anthropological thought. In the second, I go on to assess the relevance for anthropological understanding of alternative approaches drawn from cognitive science, ecological psychology and phenomenology. This is a considerable agenda, and in the space of a short chapter I can do no more than touch on the many questions raised.