ABSTRACT
In this chapter I conclude my analysis of the Keynesian approach to microfoundations. I deal mainly with two types of contributions: on the one hand, those of Victoria Chick, Davidson and Hicks the elder,1 all ‘representative’ members of that vast area of economic theory generally labelled ‘post-Keynesian’; on the other, those of Clower, Colander, Howitt and Leijonhufvud who-in some cases, dissatisfied with their early general equilibrium perspectives-are among those who have recently established a ‘post-Walrasian’ research programme.
