studied a different parent-child pair in the same family we might have gotten a different constellation of parenting and outcomes. The picture emerging from aggre-gating data across a set of one-child cases is valid as well, though the findings are surely attenuated by the within-family sibling variation. Still, we get a less differ-entiated picture than the one that emerges from the study of siblings. Family systems theorists have alerted "niche-picking" by different children in a farnily-tbe effort of children to find distinctive roles. Evolutionary theorists have argued that there natural competition among siblings for parental attention and other resources provided by parents. In short, there is reason to believe that there are forces motivating children differentiate themselves from their siblings, and these may counterbalance, or transform, the effects of parental inputs that might otherwise function to make them the same. Of course, some of the differentiation between siblings can come directly from differential treatment by the parents, or can stem from differential reactions by different children to the same parental inputs. INTERPRETING PARENT-CHILD COVARIANCE engage- + E =

DOI link for studied a different parent-child pair in the same family we might have gotten a different constellation of parenting and outcomes. The picture emerging from aggre-gating data across a set of one-child cases is valid as well, though the findings are surely attenuated by the within-family sibling variation. Still, we get a less differ-entiated picture than the one that emerges from the study of siblings. Family systems theorists have alerted "niche-picking" by different children in a farnily-tbe effort of children to find distinctive roles. Evolutionary theorists have argued that there natural competition among siblings for parental attention and other resources provided by parents. In short, there is reason to believe that there are forces motivating children differentiate themselves from their siblings, and these may counterbalance, or transform, the effects of parental inputs that might otherwise function to make them the same. Of course, some of the differentiation between siblings can come directly from differential treatment by the parents, or can stem from differential reactions by different children to the same parental inputs. INTERPRETING PARENT-CHILD COVARIANCE engage- + E =

studied a different parent-child pair in the same family we might have gotten a different constellation of parenting and outcomes. The picture emerging from aggre-gating data across a set of one-child cases is valid as well, though the findings are surely attenuated by the within-family sibling variation. Still, we get a less differ-entiated picture than the one that emerges from the study of siblings. Family systems theorists have alerted "niche-picking" by different children in a farnily-tbe effort of children to find distinctive roles. Evolutionary theorists have argued that there natural competition among siblings for parental attention and other resources provided by parents. In short, there is reason to believe that there are forces motivating children differentiate themselves from their siblings, and these may counterbalance, or transform, the effects of parental inputs that might otherwise function to make them the same. Of course, some of the differentiation between siblings can come directly from differential treatment by the parents, or can stem from differential reactions by different children to the same parental inputs. INTERPRETING PARENT-CHILD COVARIANCE engage- + E =