ABSTRACT
Curated desires Our individual experience of the city is innately fragmented, episodic and partial. In
order to navigate the city a path must be traced. This path may consist of a sequence
of known streets or a series of views to distant landmarks, but it could equally be
framed by the determination to find something less tangible; warmth, fresh air, adven-
ture or solace. Along this path individual moments are later singled out as significant
milestones or as distinct, and sometimes treasured, memories. In between these
moments, the rest is blurred or lost. This is why an individual’s experience of the city is
fragmentary. The mind makes sense of these moments by placing them in a historical
sequence or by sorting them into a range of possible groupings and then by represent-
ing or reframing them, in dairies, conversations and reminiscences. In this way, we
each curate our experience of the city. In this sense, curation has more in common
with navigation or framing than it has with the science and practice of mapping. The
traditional cartographic concept of mapping implies a holistic attempt to define the
limits or characteristics of something. In contrast, navigation and framing suggest a
process of selection and organisation within a larger set of possibilities. Both curation
and cartography are necessarily representational, but the former infers the existence of
a totality from the selective presentation of its elements, while the latter seeks to con-
struct a whole and identify its constituent parts. The point of theoretical slippage
between curation and cartography is the act of mapping; a process which serves both
the creation and ordering of knowledge.
