ABSTRACT
In discussing any potentially controversial subject it is always best to make one's perspective and focus clear. Denying the legitimate conscientious objector exemption from active participation in war or training for war would be enforced compliance, under threat of punitive sanction, with actions contrary to his religious commitment and moral obligations. Civilian Public Service, it was hoped, would constitute recognition of sincerely held religious objections to war and military service and, at the same time, provide the opportunity to perform truly meaningful non-military service to the nation. General Hershey probably would have been more circumspect in his response, but the exchange does reflect an inherent lack of sensitivity in Selective Service policy and action. If in public rhetoric and private conversations with leaders of the pacifist community, General Hershey, Col. Truly meaningful non-military service opportunities were only occasionally made available to the men in camp.
