ABSTRACT
For that reason, there is everything to be said for not discussing it as if it could be interpreted in terms of abstract principles. Discussion must be kept within the bounds of tradition. Burke condemns the radical critics of the constitution for 'teaching the people to believe, that all ancient institutions are the result of ignorance; and that all prescriptive government is in its nature usurpation'. For the mass of men 'are not formed for finding their own way in the labyrinths of political theory, and are made to reject the clue, and to disdain the guide. Then will be felt . . . the ruin which follows the disjoining of religion from the state; the separation of morality from policy; and the giving conscience no concern and no coactive or coercive force in the most material of all the social ties, the principle of our obligation to government.'14 Criticism which attacks the fundamentals of the tradition puts all in doubt. It would loose the bonds of society, and reíase the worst passions in men, which only reverence, habit and 'useful prejudices' can keep in
check. We must 'venerate, where we are not able presently to comprehend'.
