ABSTRACT
Gilbert is perfectly right to point out the limitations of Eysenck's work on sex and marriage, and I find little to argue with in his proposals for ideal research in the field. However, it is asking too much of any one researcher, even the energetic and redoubtable Hans Eysenck, to have single-handedly done everything that he recommends. Eysenck's entry into the field of sex and marriage is fairly recent, and in a short time he has made a very appreciable contribution.
