ABSTRACT

Scammell & Nephew Ltd v Ouston [1941] 1 All ER 14, HL, p 21 Lord Wright: At the oral conversations, the respondents had clearly insisted that a hire-purchase agreement was essential. No terms, however, of such an agreement had been settled, nor, indeed, had it been discussed with whom the agreement would be made. HC Ouston, when asked in cross-examination, ‘The hire-purchase agreement, of course, you did not expect, I suppose, to be with Messrs Scammells, did you?’ replied: ‘I knew very well it would not have been. To the best of my knowledge, anyhow, I thought it would be, as it turned out to be, with United Dominions.’