quantity of work contracted for, whereas in the former, the defect related to the quality of the work which is only remediable in damages, not giving rise to a right to reject. The cases considered so far have all involved bilateral contracts in which the parties are normally dependent upon each other for the successful completion of the contract. However, different problems may arise in the case of performance of unilateral contracts, since in this case, the promisee is forced to perform his/her side of the contract before any performance obligation falls upon the promisor.

DOI link for quantity of work contracted for, whereas in the former, the defect related to the quality of the work which is only remediable in damages, not giving rise to a right to reject. The cases considered so far have all involved bilateral contracts in which the parties are normally dependent upon each other for the successful completion of the contract. However, different problems may arise in the case of performance of unilateral contracts, since in this case, the promisee is forced to perform his/her side of the contract before any performance obligation falls upon the promisor.

quantity of work contracted for, whereas in the former, the defect related to the quality of the work which is only remediable in damages, not giving rise to a right to reject. The cases considered so far have all involved bilateral contracts in which the parties are normally dependent upon each other for the successful completion of the contract. However, different problems may arise in the case of performance of unilateral contracts, since in this case, the promisee is forced to perform his/her side of the contract before any performance obligation falls upon the promisor.